September 20, 1998
It is with great reluctance and regret that I submit this letter of
resignation. Even though I want to continue to participate in the
official investigation and assist in finding the killer of JonBenet, I find
that I cannot in good conscience be a part of the persecution of
innocent people. It would be highly improper and unethical for me to
stay when I so strongly believe this.
It has been almost 19 months since we talked that day in your office
and you asked me to assist you in this investigation. It has turned out
to be more of a challenge than either of us anticipated. When we
first met I told you that my style of approaching an investigation is
from the concept of not working a particular theory, but working the
case. Detectives collect and record information from many sources,
analyze it, couple that with their experience and training and let "the
case" tell them where to go. This process may take days, weeks or
years, depending on the direction the case tells you to go. Sometimes
you must investigate "many paths" in order to find the killer. It is not
a political speed contest where expediency should outweigh justice,
where "resolving" the case is solving the case.
Alex, even though I have been unable to actively investigate, I have been in a position to
collect, record and analyze every piece of information given to your office in the course of
this investigation. I believe that I know this case better than anyone does. I know what has
been investigated and what hasn't, what evidence exists and what doesn't, what information
has been leaked and what hasn't. I am a detective with a proven record of successful
investigations. I have looked at the murder of JonBenet Ramsey through the eyes of age
and experience and a thorough knowledge of the case.
At this point in the investigation "the case" tells me that John and Patsy Ramsey did not kill
their daughter, that a very dangerous killer is still out there and no one is actively looking for
him. There are still many areas of investigation which must be explored before life and
death decisions are made.
When I was hired I had no agenda one way or the other, my allegiance was to the case, not
the Police Department nor John and Patsy Ramsey. My agenda has not changed. I only
desire to be able to investigate the case and find the killer of JonBenet and will continue to
do so as long as I am able. The chances of catching him working from the "outside looking
in" are very slim, but I have a great "Partner" who I'm sure will lead the way. There is no
doubt that I will be facing a great deal of opposition and ridicule in the future, because I
intend to stand with this family and somehow help them through this and find the killer of
their daughter. Perhaps others who believe this will also help.
The Boulder Police Department has many fine and dedicated men and women who also
want justice for JonBenet. They are just going in the wrong direction and have been since
day one of the investigation. Instead of letting the case tell them where to go, they have
elected to follow a theory and let their theory direct them rather than allowing the evidence
to direct them. The case tells me there is substantial, credible evidence of an intruder and
lack of evidence that the parents are involved. If this is true, they too are tragic victims
whose misery has been compounded by a misdirected and flawed investigation,
unsubstantiated leaks, rumors and accusations.
I have worked in this profession for the past 32 years and have always been loyal to it, the
men and women in it, and what it represents, because I believed that justice has always
prevailed. In this case, however, I believe that justice is not being served, that innocent
people are being targeted and could be charged with a murder they did not commit.
The law enforcement Code of Ethics states it very well. My fundamental duty is to "serve
mankind; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the
weak against oppression or intimidation, the peaceful against violence or disorder. To
respect the constitutional rights of all men to liberty, equality and justice." This applies not
only to JonBenet but to her mother and father as well.
I want to thank you and the others in the office for the wonderful support and treatment I
have received. You have a great D.A.'s Office and the men and women who work with
you are some of the most honest and dedicated people I have ever met. My life has been
enriched because of this memorable time together. I have especially enjoyed working
closely with Peter Hofstrom and Trip DeMuth, who also have dedicated so much of their
lives to this case. I have never met two more fair, honest and dedicated defenders of our
Alex, you are in a difficult position. The media and peer pressure are incredible. You are
inundated with conflicting facts and information, and "expert" opinions. And now you have
an old detective telling you that the Ramseys did not do it and to wait and investigate this
case more thoroughly before a very tragic mistake would be made. What a double travesty
it could be; an innocent person indicted, and a vicious killer on the loose to prey on another
innocent child and no one to stop him.
History will be the judge as to how we conducted ourselves and how we handled our
Shoes, shoes, the victim's shoes, who will stand in the victim's shoes?
Good Luck to you and your fine office and may God bless you in the awesome decisions
you must soon make.
Detective Lou Smit